YEREVAN — Ashot Ghulian, the Karabakh parliament speaker said on Friday that it is still too early to speak of territorial concessions to Azerbaijan that would be part of a broader Armenian-Azerbaijani peace deal.

“I believe that now, especially after April 2016 [fighting in Karabakh,] we have a much better idea of all components of our security system,” Ghulian old reporters in Yerevan.

“That system includes both territories and our economic viability. I am deeply convinced that we cannot weaken that reserve with anything or give up anything in return for some unknown things,” he said.

“I don’t think that we should engage in such talk prematurely because that would only undermine our internal strength as we would start looking for those who said concessions can be made and who said they cannot,” added Ghulian.

In that regard, Ghulian declined to comment on President Serzh Sarkisian’s recent remark that a peaceful resolution of the Karabakh dispute could only be “painful” to both conflicting sides.

Sarkisian spoke two weeks after his October 16 meeting with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev that was held in Geneva. The two leaders pledged to intensify the peace process and bolster the ceasefire regime in the conflict zone.

The U.S., Russian and French mediators announced in the Swiss city that they will soon hold follow-up “working sessions” with Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian and his Azerbaijani counterpart Elmar Mammadyarov. The talks could be held as early as next week.

Ghulian said that the Armenian side has toughened its position on Karabakh peace since the April 2016 hostilities. “I think that for the moment there are no grounds for softening that position,” he said.

Ghulian spoke after a delegation of Karabakh lawmakers headed by him held a regular meeting with members of Armenia’s parliament. The delegation was received by Sarkisian later in the day. A statement on the meeting released by the presidential press service did not say whether they discussed the upcoming Armenian-Azerbaijani negotiations.

Over the past decade the international mediators have advanced a framework peace accord calling for a phased settlement that would start with the liberation of Armenian-controlled districts around Karabakh. In return, Karabakh’s predominantly Armenian population would be able determine the territory’s internationally recognized status in a future referendum.

Armenia’s leadership has repeatedly said that this peace formula is largely acceptable to it. Karabakh Armenian leaders have been far more skeptical about it.

1 comment
  1. K”Karabakh’s predominantly Armenian population would be able to determine the territory’s internationally recognized status in a future referendum.” Why future? That referendum already happened so NO NEED to do that again. It was already unanimously accepted as Artsakh declared itself free from anything called Azerbaijan. It has been democratic for 25 years. Any concessions has to absolutely have with it the FINAL status of Artsakh right now. period. Even better , instead how about declaring Artsakh free now and then lets talk about concessions? Why not this formula? Why should Armenia compromise first? Armenia won the war. When does the winner compromise itself as a starting point ever in negotiations? Only in Armenia. Also Artsakh itself needs to be part of the negotiating process. This is unbelievable.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign Up for Our Newsletters

Get notified of the latest updates from MassisPost.

You May Also Like

Land and Culture Organization Restores 7th Century Lori Monastery

PASADENA — Summer 2015 marked another successful campaign for the Land and…

Los Angeles Armenian-American Community to Commemorate 105th Anniversary of the Armenian Genocide

The Los Angeles Armenian-American community will collectively commemorate the 105th anniversary of…

World Bank to Implement $700 Million Worth Programs for Armenia

YEREVAN — Armenian president Serzh Sarkisian received October 20 the World Bank’s…

Turkey’s Islamized Armenians – Do They Matter to You? an Interview with Raffi Bedrosyan

By Anoush Melkonian, London Do Turkey’s Hidden or Islamized Armenians matter to…