NEW YORK — Writing in The New York Times, Daniel L. Bynam of the Brookings Institution and author Charles King, both of whom teach at Georgetown, point out that phantom states are usually the product of conflict, often between neighboring states and their existence is a sources of future conflict.
A more productive approach to such breakaway countries, Bynam and King argue, is to engage them both politically and economically as though they were legally independent.
They argue that conditions are ripe for a similar solution to the standoff over Nagorno-Karabakh. By offering to protect Karabakh’s territory and establishing trade and political ties while stopping short of formal recognition, and by engaging both the Armenian and Azeri governments at the same time, Western nations, along with Russia in this case, could provide Nagorno-Karabakh the space it needs to develop stable democratic institutions and strengthen its economy.

Read the New York Times article here.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Sign Up for Our Newsletters

Get notified of the latest updates from MassisPost.

You May Also Like

Mevlut Cavusoglu Appointed Turkey’s New Foreign Minister

ANKARA — Turkey’s new Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, on Thursday,  reappointed all…

NKR Defense Forces Retaliate to Azerbaijani Provocation (Video)

STEPANAKERT — Karabakh Defense Army frontline troops have retaliated by targeting Azerbaijani…

Social Locker

 

Statement on Armenian Genocide Removed from Swedish Government Website Under Ankara’s Pressure

STOCKHOLM — The Swedish government seems to have made concessions, removing Sweden’s…