NEW YORK — Writing in The New York Times, Daniel L. Bynam of the Brookings Institution and author Charles King, both of whom teach at Georgetown, point out that phantom states are usually the product of conflict, often between neighboring states and their existence is a sources of future conflict.
A more productive approach to such breakaway countries, Bynam and King argue, is to engage them both politically and economically as though they were legally independent.
They argue that conditions are ripe for a similar solution to the standoff over Nagorno-Karabakh. By offering to protect Karabakh’s territory and establishing trade and political ties while stopping short of formal recognition, and by engaging both the Armenian and Azeri governments at the same time, Western nations, along with Russia in this case, could provide Nagorno-Karabakh the space it needs to develop stable democratic institutions and strengthen its economy.

Read the New York Times article here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign Up for Our Newsletters

Get notified of the latest updates from MassisPost.

You May Also Like

Armenia, UAE Keen on Developing Economic Cooperation

ABU DHABI — On a visit to the United Arab Emirates, Armenian…

Armenian Feminists Respond to \’Global Armenians\’ Advertisement in the New York Times

New York — The below open letter and pledge were developed by…

Turkish Intellectuals Who Have Recognized The Armenian Genocide: Cemil Koçak

By Hambersom Aghbashian Prof. Cemil Koçak (born in Izmir- Turkey in 1956)…

UN Human Rights Council Adopts Armenia’s “Prevention of Genocide” Resolution

GENEVE — On March 30, during the 61st session of the United…