NEW YORK — Writing in The New York Times, Daniel L. Bynam of the Brookings Institution and author Charles King, both of whom teach at Georgetown, point out that phantom states are usually the product of conflict, often between neighboring states and their existence is a sources of future conflict.
A more productive approach to such breakaway countries, Bynam and King argue, is to engage them both politically and economically as though they were legally independent.
They argue that conditions are ripe for a similar solution to the standoff over Nagorno-Karabakh. By offering to protect Karabakh’s territory and establishing trade and political ties while stopping short of formal recognition, and by engaging both the Armenian and Azeri governments at the same time, Western nations, along with Russia in this case, could provide Nagorno-Karabakh the space it needs to develop stable democratic institutions and strengthen its economy.

Read the New York Times article here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign Up for Our Newsletters

Get notified of the latest updates from MassisPost.

You May Also Like

Imagine Armenia: A Presentation by Repatriated Armenians

LOS ANGELES — The Armenian Bar Association invites its members and the…

Raisi Warning Aliyev: Any Attempt to Change Iran’s Border with Armenia is Rejected

ASTANA — Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi reportedly again warned against attempts to…

Azerbaijan Spreading Fake News About Evacuation of Stepanakert

STEPANAKERT — Azerbaijani intelligence agencies are spreading photos of fake documents about…

France Initiating an Urgent Session at the UN Security Council, Macron Tells Pashinyan

YEREVAN — Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan discussed in a telephone conversation…