NEW YORK — Writing in The New York Times, Daniel L. Bynam of the Brookings Institution and author Charles King, both of whom teach at Georgetown, point out that phantom states are usually the product of conflict, often between neighboring states and their existence is a sources of future conflict.
A more productive approach to such breakaway countries, Bynam and King argue, is to engage them both politically and economically as though they were legally independent.
They argue that conditions are ripe for a similar solution to the standoff over Nagorno-Karabakh. By offering to protect Karabakh’s territory and establishing trade and political ties while stopping short of formal recognition, and by engaging both the Armenian and Azeri governments at the same time, Western nations, along with Russia in this case, could provide Nagorno-Karabakh the space it needs to develop stable democratic institutions and strengthen its economy.

Read the New York Times article here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sign Up for Our Newsletters

Get notified of the latest updates from MassisPost.

You May Also Like

Pallone Leads 63 Caucus Members Fight for Inclusion of Robust Funding for Armenia and Artsakh

WASHINGTON, DC – Congressional Caucus on Armenian Issues Co-Chairs Congressman Frank Pallone,…

Regional Stability and Inviolability of Borders Are “Red Lines” for Iran

YEREVAN — Regional stability, security and inviolability of borders are the “red…

Blundering American Ambassadors Unmask the War on Terror

By David Boyajian We know that U.S. ambassadors tend to be bureaucratic…

Armenian Community to Open New School Building in Istanbul

ISTANBUL (Agos) — Istanbul’s Armenian community is set to open a new…