Letter to the Editor: Mr. Armen Sarkissian and the ARF

“And behold, a greater than Solomon is here” (Matt.12:42)

Dear Editors,

I have heard the broadcast and the read the text of the Armenian President on the crisis in Armenia and Artsakh, calling for the resignation of the Prime Minister, the only elected head of state by the people of Armenia.While the President has changed his tune smelling an opportunity to rise the greasy pool, the ARF is circulating a statement calling for the resignation of the Prime Minister in the name of the Diaspora. The Dashnak part has no legitimate authority or validation to make infallible sounding ex cathedra pronouncements like the Pope of Rome. Fortunately,neither the President nor the Dashnak Party have been endowed with these two dogmatic epithets (a) to make ex cathedra pronouncments and (b) assuming infallibility. As in the case of the President and now the ARF by blustering chicanery scramble to power, a party that has had only governed a country for two years in their 100 year old history: Behold there is no salvation for the Armenian people outside the ARF – like there is no salvation for the faithful of the Armenian Apostolic Orthodox church outside the Church of Rome «Հռովմից  դուրս  չիք փրկութիւն». They lend themselves to mockery by inflaming the situation by joining the mob in the Freedom Square, demanding the Prime Minister’s resignation . Their jaw dropping hypocrisy and arrogance beggars belief. While the country is in war ,the President traveled to every corner of the globe seeking support from foreign institutions, and returned empty handed in total disgrace. Did he consult the Prime Minister or the Foreign Minister for his personal advancement. When he returned from his tours did he meet the Prime Minister or the Foreign Minister and report to them the results of his self seeking importance? Did he ever think that as President his visit to the soldiers in the front, would have raised the moral well-being of the fighters.

Does he consider as a seasoned diplomat, his contribution to this conflict as ambassador and President a success or a failure? For thirty years since the inception of the independent Armenia, he has been a central figure in the diplomatic core of the country and in that period he failed to secure the support of any country, most of all his adopted country the United Kingdom of Britain and Ireland. Like all the others he used his position to mass wealth, act as expert consultant on the Caucasus for British companies, for which he was handsomely rewarded by obtaining British citizenship. Since then he has traveled to the countries in the Middle East whose source of oil supply is Baku. Is this an attempt to make sure that his consultation fees are not cancelled.

He has been the most malign figure in the present government. Every intervention of his in the political sphere has been negative – the gold mines of Amulsar, his nomination of a candidate to the Supreme Court a figure who had twice been rejected on corruption charges. His intervention to establish an Armenian Embassy in Israel was the worst diplomatic decision. The Ambassador of the Independent Republic of Armenia, who when dismissed from his post assembled a crowd of his supporters whom he had convinced that he was irreplaceable, lowers down the country’s flag and hands it over to the Chairman of the London Armenian Community. It is interesting that while the whole nation is calling for the return of the wealth robbed by the former two Presidents, he has remained silent. Why is that so? Is it the case that he does not agree with the nation or is it because he is part of the gang? He was appointed President by Serge Sarkissian, his patron and it is not surprising that he will not speak against him but seek the resignation of the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister‘s actions will soon or later expose his corrupt dealings. His scurrilous bellicose polemic that the Prime Minister had not consulted him has now been proved to be both dishonest and a shameless lie. The Prime Minister had informed him of his decision. The President first called for his resignation then he changed his mind and now he is supporting him, smelling an opportunity to gain the favor of the population, hoping to present himself as the Savior of the country. Rather than passing pub strictures he should acknowledge his miserable failure as a diplomat.

In his speeches he continues to shamefully exploit the diaspora, have been proved to be bluffs and fibs, which have been condemned in the diaspora. When in 1999 a mob invaded the parliament building and murdered 8 parliamentarians among them the Defense Minister Vazgen Sarkissian (who had sacked him as Prime Minister) he was in Moscow. This time round, when the mob was ransacking the Parliament building Mr Sarkissian was abroad. Armenia is not the 52 state of the United States or a colony of the diaspora. Each time he speaks, he identifies himself and validates his pronouncement by appealing to the diaspora, forgetting that his foremost duty is to speak on behalf of the people of Armenia. He is the President of the Republic of Armenia . His posturing is cynical, self-indulgent, insincere and to endorse his credibility, constantly reminds the public that he is one of them and to prove that he once stood outside the Presidential palace and distributed ice-cream. His parents were from Iran but he was born in Yerevan. In the same vein the ARF is a party that has no right or authority to seek the resignation of a Prime Minister. The only authority that can demand the resignation of the Prime Minister are those fathers, mothers, sisters and brothers who sent their sons and daughters to the front to fight the enemy. Patriotism requires sacrifice.

As a priest, I am very upset that the Catholicos who came to the throne of St. Gregory the Illuminator on the day, that a mob invaded the parliament building and massacred the cream of Armenian political figures, should give his consent to a priest to stand in a square and call for the resignation of the Prime Minister. As Catholicos of All Armenians instead of taking selfies on every possible occasion with the corrupt former two Presidents , he should use his moral standing and call upon them to return their looted wealth.

The ARF has been part of the former governing body. Is it not hypocritical of them to blame the Prime Minister for the tragedy? It is typical of a party of 100 years history to always side with the minority and the Western powers rather than the nation. The first Armenian Republic was born out of chaos. The ARF committee sitting in Tiflis were given the power to run the country. It came into existence on 28 May 1918 and ceased to exist in November of 1920. In 1918 the entire nation came together for the first time at the battle of Sardarabad to save the country from total extinction. Their first action of the infant republic was to make peace with Turkey by signing the infamous treaty of Batum on 5th June. The Dashnak party clung blindly to the Allies, but received nothing tangible in return. The Communists introduced Soviet rule, an action that at least forestalled the complete Turkish take-over of Armenia in April 1921.

The Dashnak party members fled the country and began sabotaging activities in the diaspora creating two conflicting factions WE and THEM which continues to this day. The tension even split the only institution that had protected and maintained the unity of the Armenian people for centuries – the Armenian Apostolic Orthodox Church. In 1952 the break in relations between the two church jurisdictions was sealed, exacerbated by the East-West divide of the Cold War, in which the Dashnak party has played a leading role. The creation of the third republic gave hope that the two factions would unite. Even the installment of a key figure in the campaign of schism, in the person of Garegin II Sarkissian Catholicos of Cilicia [Garegin I st] to the throne of Holy Etchmiadzin, failed to dis-validate the schism and bring reconciliation among the church communities in the west, which is crucial if the destiny of present newly found independence was not to suffer the same destiny as the first republic. For some unknown reasons the Dashnak Party assumes it is their God given, autocratic or totalitarian right to govern over the Armenian people and church.

Emperor Maurice of Byzantium [Armenian by birth) (582-602) in a letter to Khosrov the Persian king concerning the Armenian princes and their troops writes «They are a perverse and disobedient race, he said; they are between us and cause trouble. Now come, I shall gather mine and send them to Thrace, you gather yours and order them to be taken to the east. If they die, our enemies die; if they kill, they kill our enemies; but we shall live in Peace. For if they remain in their own land, we shall have no rest» [«Ազգ մի խոտոր և անհնազանդ են, ասէ, կան ի միջի մերում և պղտորեն: Բայց եկ՝  ասէ , ես զիմս ժողովեմ և ի Թրակէ գումարեմ. և դու զքոյդ  ժողովէ և հրամայէ  յԱրևելս  տանել: Զի եթէ մեռանին թշնամիք մեռանին. և եթէ սպանանեն՝ զթշնամիս սպանանեն. և մեք կեցցուք խաղաղութեամբ: Զի եթէ դոքա յերկրի իւրեանց լինիցին, մեզ հանգչել ոչ լինի» Պատմութիւն Սեբէոսի Եպիսկոպոսի ի Հերակլն, Թիֆլիս,1913,Գլուխ Զ,էջ.74]..While this Machiavellian scheme to siphon off a significant percentage of Armenian military manpower was adopted by the Greeks , the Persians policy was to encourage Armenian nobles and their military followings to enlist by offering them substantial cash inducement to fight in their campaigns..

Time is needed to evaluate the leadership of the Prime Minister Mr. Pashinyan. Major world powers have drawn small Armenia into a dirty war of regional interests that will have long lasting implications. We are witnessing the Balkanization of the Transcaucasus. This is just the beginning of a process.

«ՆՇԱՆԱՒ ՍՈՒՐԲ ԵՒ ՊԱՏՈՒԱԿԱՆ ԽԱՉԻ ՔՈ՝ՀԱԼԱԾԵԱ ԶԵՐԵՒԵԼԻ ԵՒ ԶԱՆԵՐԵՒՈՅԹ ԹՇՆԱՄԻՆ Ի ՍԱՀՄԱՆԱՑ ՄԵՐՈՑ  Ի ԲՆԱԿՈՒԹԵՆԵՍ ՄԵՐՄԷ»

Yours respectfully,

Revd. Nerses Vrej Nersessian