Categories ArmeniaFeaturedNews

OSCE/ODIHR Assessment Report: More Flexibility and Transparency in the Armenian Legislative Process

YEREVAN — The legislative process in the Republic of Armenia should be more flexible and participatory, said an assessment report presented by the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) in Yerevan on 30 October 2014.

The presentation,co-organized with the OSCE Office in Yerevan,was held for representatives from the Armenian National Assembly, the Government, state institutions, and international and civil society organizations.

Prepared upon an official request of the country’s Ministry of Justice, the “Comprehensive Assessment of the Legislative Procedure in the Republic of Armenia”, notes the large amount of legislation passed annually and as a result the heavy workload created for the government and in particular the national assembly. The assessment report recommends that more in-depth policy discussions, stakeholder consultations and impact assessments should be held at the initial stages and throughout the legislative process.

Hovhannes Manukyan, Minister of Justice of the Republic of Armenia, appreciated the professional and expert approaches evident in the report and noted: “I largely agree with the assessments and especially the one related to the time limitation of the legislative process which may cause problems. We should find a way to make sure that haste in the process does not harm the quality of the adopted legislation”.

“In order for laws to be effective and implementable, it is essential that the process whereby they are made is transparent and inclusive and that this process is preceded by in-depth policy discussions,” said Nathalie Tagwerker, the Deputy Head of the ODIHR Democratization Department. “ODIHR is ready to continue its support to Armenia’s attempts to reform its legislative process in the future.”

The assessment report builds on a preliminary ODIHR assessment of the Armenian legislative procedure completed in November 2013, which focused only on the legislative framework surrounding the law-making process.

MassisPost

Share
Published by
MassisPost
Tags feature

Recent Posts

The Paradox of “Real Armenia”: Reconciling Statehood, National Identity, and Historical Memory

The Question Behind the Concept of “Real Armenia” By K. M. GREG SARKISSIAN The impetus…

6 hours ago

Armenia Not Yet Ready for EU Membership, Pashinyan Says, While Advocating Balanced Relations with Russia

YEREVAN — Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has stated that Armenia is not currently ready to…

7 hours ago

Armenian Parliament Ratifies Housing Assistance Financing Agreement for Displaced Karabakh Families

YEREVAN — Armenia's National Assembly has ratified a financing agreement with the International Bank for…

7 hours ago

Pashinyan Calls for Transparency Over Former Officials’ Wealth, Defends Political Climate in Armenia

YEREVAN — Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan has called for greater transparency regarding the wealth accumulated…

7 hours ago

$470 Million World Trade Center Yerevan Project Officially Launched

YEREVAN — The World Trade Center Yerevan project, a $470 million public-private investment initiative expected…

7 hours ago

Amulsar Gold Mine Begins Operations as Government Projects $130 Million in Annual Tax Revenue

YEREVAN — The Amulsar gold mine officially began operations on October 10, marking the launch…

7 hours ago